2019 head-to-head · Compact Car
2019 Cadillac ATS vs Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid
MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.
AWD · 2.0L 4-cyl turbo · 8-speed automatic · 74 MPGe + 31 MPG
The 2019 Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid is the cheaper one to run. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas, 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.95/gal premium gas, it costs about $1,551 a year to fuel (74 MPGe + 31 MPG), versus $2,022 for the 2019 Cadillac ATS (23 MPG). That's roughly $471 a year, or about $2,353 over five years.
Your numbers
Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.
Fuel cost over 10 years
- Cadillac ATS
- Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid
Side by side
| Cadillac ATS | Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| $2,022 | Your annual fuel cost | $1,551 |
| 23 MPG | Combined efficiency | 74 MPGe + 31 MPG |
| 19 MPG | City | 74 MPGe / 29 MPG |
| 29 MPG | Highway | 74 MPGe / 34 MPG |
| — | Electricity use (kWh/100 mi) | 43 kWh |
| — | Driving range | 520 mi |
| — | All-electric range | 22 mi |
| 91 cu ft | Passenger volume | 96 cu ft |
| 10 cu ft | Cargo volume | 12 cu ft |
| 396 g/mi | Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) | 149 g/mi |
| 5/10 | EPA fuel economy score | 9/10 |
| 5/10 | EPA greenhouse gas score | 10/10 |
| — | Charge time at 240V | 3 hrs |
| Gas | Powertrain | Plug-in hybrid |
| Regular gasoline | Fuel | Premium gas + electricity |
| 3.6L 6-cyl | Engine / motor | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo |
| 8-speed automatic | Transmission | 8-speed automatic |
| RWD | Drivetrain | AWD |
✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.
Cadillac ATS vs Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid across model years
- Cadillac ATS
- Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid
Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.
How they differ
Per EPA interior volume figures, the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid has more passenger space (96 vs. 91 cu ft); the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid has more cargo space (12 vs. 10 cu ft).
Among 43 2019 compact cars, the Cadillac ATS ranks 26th and the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid 21st for lowest fuel cost.
The powertrains differ: the Cadillac ATS is a conventional gas model, while the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid is a plug-in hybrid.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2019 Cadillac ATS or the 2019 Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid?
Measured by cost to drive, the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid. The Cadillac ATS is rated 23 MPG combined and the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid 74 MPGe + 31 MPG (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).
How much does it cost to fuel the 2019 Cadillac ATS vs. the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid per year?
At 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas, 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.95/gal premium gas, about $2,022 for the Cadillac ATS and $1,551 for the Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid.
Which has more cargo space?
The Volvo S60 Plug-in Hybrid, with 12 cu ft of luggage volume versus 10 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).
More 2019 comparisons
Cadillac ATS vs…
Or compare the 2019 Cadillac ATS with anything else: