2017 head-to-head · Compact Car
2017 Cadillac ATS vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid
MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.
RWD · 2.0L 4-cyl turbo · 7-speed automatic · 51 MPGe + 30 MPG
On fuel costs these two are nearly tied. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas, 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.95/gal premium gas, the most efficient 2017 Cadillac ATS (26 MPG) costs about $1,788 a year to fuel and the 2017 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid (51 MPGe + 30 MPG) about $1,837.
Your numbers
Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.
Fuel cost over 10 years
- Cadillac ATS
- Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid
Side by side
| Cadillac ATS | Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| $1,788 | Your annual fuel cost | $1,837 |
| 26 MPG | Combined efficiency | 51 MPGe + 30 MPG |
| 22 MPG | City | 45 MPGe / 28 MPG |
| 32 MPG | Highway | 61 MPGe / 32 MPG |
| — | Electricity use (kWh/100 mi) | 56 kWh |
| — | Driving range | 410 mi |
| — | All-electric range | 9 mi |
| 91 cu ft | Passenger volume | 91 cu ft |
| 10 cu ft | Cargo volume | 10 cu ft |
| 347 g/mi | Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) | 215 g/mi |
| 6/10 | EPA fuel economy score | 8/10 |
| 6/10 | EPA greenhouse gas score | 9/10 |
| — | Charge time at 240V | 1.5 hrs |
| Gas | Powertrain | Plug-in hybrid |
| Regular gasoline | Fuel | Premium gas + electricity |
| 2.5L 4-cyl | Engine / motor | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo |
| 8-speed automatic | Transmission | 7-speed automatic |
| RWD | Drivetrain | RWD |
✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.
Cadillac ATS vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid across model years
- Cadillac ATS
- Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid
Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.
How they differ
Among 50 2017 compact cars, the Cadillac ATS ranks 28th and the Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid 29th for lowest fuel cost.
The powertrains differ: the Cadillac ATS is a conventional gas model, while the Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid is a plug-in hybrid.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2017 Cadillac ATS or the 2017 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid?
Measured by cost to drive, the Cadillac ATS. The Cadillac ATS is rated 26 MPG combined and the Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid 51 MPGe + 30 MPG (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).
How much does it cost to fuel the 2017 Cadillac ATS vs. the Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid per year?
At 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas, 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.95/gal premium gas, about $1,788 for the Cadillac ATS and $1,837 for the Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid.
Cadillac ATS vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid in other years
More 2017 comparisons
Cadillac ATS vs…
Mercedes-Benz C-Class Plug-in Hybrid vs…
Or compare the 2017 Cadillac ATS with anything else: