2016 head-to-head · Compact Car

2016 Kia Forte vs Mitsubishi Lancer

MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.

Swap sides
✓ Cheaper to run
$1,550/ year to fuel
30 MPG
✓ Cheaper to run
$1,550/ year to fuel
30 MPG

On fuel costs these two are nearly tied. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas, the most efficient 2016 Kia Forte (30 MPG) costs about $1,550 a year to fuel and the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer (30 MPG) about $1,550.

Your numbers

Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.

Fuel cost over 10 years

  • Kia Forte
  • Mitsubishi Lancer

Side by side

Kia ForteMitsubishi Lancer
$1,550 Your annual fuel cost $1,550
30 MPG Combined efficiency 30 MPG
26 MPG City 27 MPG
37 MPG Highway 34 MPG
96 cu ft Passenger volume 93 cu ft
14 cu ft Cargo volume 12 cu ft
294 g/mi Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) 298 g/mi
7/10 EPA fuel economy score 7/10
7/10 EPA greenhouse gas score 7/10
Gas Powertrain Gas
Regular gasoline Fuel Regular gasoline
1.8L 4-cyl Engine / motor 2.0L 4-cyl
6-speed automatic Transmission CVT
FWD Drivetrain FWD

✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.

Kia Forte vs Mitsubishi Lancer across model years

  • Kia Forte
  • Mitsubishi Lancer

Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.

How they differ

Per EPA interior volume figures, the Kia Forte has more passenger space (96 vs. 93 cu ft); the Kia Forte has more cargo space (14 vs. 12 cu ft).

Among 51 2016 compact cars, the Kia Forte ranks 23rd and the Mitsubishi Lancer 22nd for lowest fuel cost.

Frequently asked questions

How much does it cost to fuel the 2016 Kia Forte vs. the Mitsubishi Lancer per year?

At 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas, about $1,550 for the Kia Forte and $1,550 for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Which has more cargo space?

The Kia Forte, with 14 cu ft of luggage volume versus 12 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).

Kia Forte vs Mitsubishi Lancer in other years

More 2016 comparisons

Or compare the 2016 Kia Forte with anything else:

Keep exploring