2016 head-to-head · Subcompact Car

2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs Volkswagen Eos

MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.

Swap sides
✓ Cheaper to run
$2,114/ year to fuel
22 MPG
✓ Cheaper to run
$2,370/ year to fuel
25 MPG

FWD · 2.0L 4-cyl turbo · 6-speed dual-clutch · 25 MPG

The 2016 Chevrolet Camaro is the cheaper one to run. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas and $3.95/gal premium gas, it costs about $2,114 a year to fuel (22 MPG), versus $2,370 for the 2016 Volkswagen Eos (25 MPG). That's roughly $256 a year, or about $1,282 over five years.

Your numbers

Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.

Fuel cost over 10 years

  • Chevrolet Camaro
  • Volkswagen Eos

Side by side

Chevrolet CamaroVolkswagen Eos
$2,114 Your annual fuel cost $2,370
22 MPG Combined efficiency 25 MPG
19 MPG City 22 MPG
28 MPG Highway 30 MPG
83 cu ft Passenger volume 77 cu ft
8 cu ft Cargo volume 11 cu ft
395 g/mi Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) 354 g/mi
5/10 EPA fuel economy score 6/10
5/10 EPA greenhouse gas score 6/10
Gas Powertrain Gas
Regular gasoline Fuel Premium gasoline
3.6L 6-cyl Engine / motor 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
8-speed automatic Transmission 6-speed dual-clutch
RWD Drivetrain FWD

✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.

Chevrolet Camaro vs Volkswagen Eos across model years

  • Chevrolet Camaro
  • Volkswagen Eos

Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.

How they differ

Per EPA interior volume figures, the Chevrolet Camaro has more passenger space (83 vs. 77 cu ft); the Volkswagen Eos has more cargo space (11 vs. 8 cu ft).

Among 39 2016 subcompact cars, the Chevrolet Camaro ranks 17th and the Volkswagen Eos 25th for lowest fuel cost.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro or the 2016 Volkswagen Eos?

Measured by cost to drive, the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro is rated 22 MPG combined and the Volkswagen Eos 25 MPG (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).

How much does it cost to fuel the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs. the Volkswagen Eos per year?

At 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas and $3.95/gal premium gas, about $2,114 for the Chevrolet Camaro and $2,370 for the Volkswagen Eos.

Which has more cargo space?

The Volkswagen Eos, with 11 cu ft of luggage volume versus 8 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).

More 2016 comparisons

Or compare the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro with anything else:

Keep exploring