2016 head-to-head · Compact Car

2016 Cadillac ATS-V vs Rolls-Royce Phantom

MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.

Swap sides
✓ Cheaper to run
$3,118/ year to fuel
19 MPG
✓ Cheaper to run
$4,232/ year to fuel
14 MPG

RWD · 6.7L 12-cyl · 8-speed automatic · 14 MPG

The 2016 Cadillac ATS-V is the cheaper one to run. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.95/gal premium gas, it costs about $3,118 a year to fuel (19 MPG), versus $4,232 for the 2016 Rolls-Royce Phantom (14 MPG). That's roughly $1,114 a year, or about $5,569 over five years.

Your numbers

Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.

Fuel cost over 10 years

  • Cadillac ATS-V
  • Rolls-Royce Phantom

Side by side

Cadillac ATS-VRolls-Royce Phantom
$3,118 Your annual fuel cost $4,232
19 MPG Combined efficiency 14 MPG
17 MPG City 11 MPG
23 MPG Highway 19 MPG
91 cu ft Passenger volume 97 cu ft
10 cu ft Cargo volume 11 cu ft
465 g/mi Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) 637 g/mi
4/10 EPA fuel economy score 2/10
4/10 EPA greenhouse gas score 2/10
Gas Powertrain Gas
Premium gasoline Fuel Premium gasoline
3.6L 6-cyl turbo Engine / motor 6.7L 12-cyl
6-speed manual Transmission 8-speed automatic
RWD Drivetrain RWD

✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.

Cadillac ATS-V vs Rolls-Royce Phantom across model years

  • Cadillac ATS-V
  • Rolls-Royce Phantom

Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.

How they differ

Per EPA interior volume figures, the Rolls-Royce Phantom has more passenger space (97 vs. 91 cu ft); the Rolls-Royce Phantom has more cargo space (11 vs. 10 cu ft).

Among 51 2016 compact cars, the Cadillac ATS-V ranks 48th and the Rolls-Royce Phantom 51st for lowest fuel cost.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2016 Cadillac ATS-V or the 2016 Rolls-Royce Phantom?

Measured by cost to drive, the Cadillac ATS-V. The Cadillac ATS-V is rated 19 MPG combined and the Rolls-Royce Phantom 14 MPG (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).

How much does it cost to fuel the 2016 Cadillac ATS-V vs. the Rolls-Royce Phantom per year?

At 15,000 miles a year with $3.95/gal premium gas, about $3,118 for the Cadillac ATS-V and $4,232 for the Rolls-Royce Phantom.

Which has more cargo space?

The Rolls-Royce Phantom, with 11 cu ft of luggage volume versus 10 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).

Cadillac ATS-V vs Rolls-Royce Phantom in other years

More 2016 comparisons

Or compare the 2016 Cadillac ATS-V with anything else:

Keep exploring