2015 head-to-head · Midsize Car
2015 Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid vs Toyota Avalon Hybrid
MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.
FWD · 2.0L 4-cyl · CVT · 88 MPGe + 38 MPG
FWD · 2.5L 4-cyl · CVT · 40 MPG
On fuel costs these two are nearly tied. Driving 15,000 miles a year with 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.10/gal regular gas, the most efficient 2015 Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid (88 MPGe + 38 MPG) costs about $1,122 a year to fuel and the 2015 Toyota Avalon Hybrid (40 MPG) about $1,162.
Your numbers
Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.
Fuel cost over 10 years
- Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid
- Toyota Avalon Hybrid
Side by side
| Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid | Toyota Avalon Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| $1,122 | Your annual fuel cost | $1,162 |
| 88 MPGe + 38 MPG | Combined efficiency | 40 MPG |
| 95 MPGe / 40 MPG | City | 40 MPG |
| 81 MPGe / 36 MPG | Highway | 39 MPG |
| 37 kWh | Electricity use (kWh/100 mi) | — |
| 550 mi | Driving range | — |
| 20 mi | All-electric range | — |
| 100 cu ft | Passenger volume | 104 cu ft |
| 19 cu ft | Cargo volume | 14 cu ft |
| 129 g/mi | Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) | 223 g/mi |
| 10/10 | EPA fuel economy score | 9/10 |
| 10/10 | EPA greenhouse gas score | 9/10 |
| 2.5 hrs | Charge time at 240V | — |
| Plug-in hybrid | Powertrain | Hybrid |
| Regular gas + electricity | Fuel | Regular gasoline |
| 2.0L 4-cyl | Engine / motor | 2.5L 4-cyl |
| CVT | Transmission | CVT |
| FWD | Drivetrain | FWD |
✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.
Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid vs Toyota Avalon Hybrid across model years
- Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid
- Toyota Avalon Hybrid
Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.
How they differ
Per EPA interior volume figures, the Toyota Avalon Hybrid has more passenger space (104 vs. 100 cu ft); the Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid has more cargo space (19 vs. 14 cu ft).
Among 69 2015 midsize cars, the Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid ranks 7th and the Toyota Avalon Hybrid 11th for lowest fuel cost.
The powertrains differ: the Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid is a plug-in hybrid, while the Toyota Avalon Hybrid is a full hybrid.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2015 Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid or the 2015 Toyota Avalon Hybrid?
Measured by cost to drive, the Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid. The Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid is rated 88 MPGe + 38 MPG combined and the Toyota Avalon Hybrid 40 MPG (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).
How much does it cost to fuel the 2015 Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid vs. the Toyota Avalon Hybrid per year?
At 15,000 miles a year with 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.10/gal regular gas, about $1,122 for the Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid and $1,162 for the Toyota Avalon Hybrid.
Which has more cargo space?
The Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid, with 19 cu ft of luggage volume versus 14 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).
Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid vs Toyota Avalon Hybrid in other years
More 2015 comparisons
Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid vs…
Or compare the 2015 Ford C-MAX Plug-in Hybrid with anything else: